US Private Credit Market Faces Liquidity Risks as Bank Debt Reaches $349B
Federal Reserve data reveals nonbank lenders owe $349 billion to banks while increasingly accepting non-cash interest from borrowers.
US Private Credit Market Faces Liquidity Risks as Bank Debt Reaches $349B
Federal Reserve data reveals nonbank lenders owe $349 billion to banks while increasingly accepting non-cash interest from borrowers.
Federal Reserve Data Exposes Interconnection in the Private Credit Market
A growing liquidity disconnect is emerging across the U.S. private credit market as nonbank lending vehicles accumulate significant bank obligations while allowing borrowers to defer cash interest payments. According to Federal Reserve accounts released on Oct. 16, private credit vehicles with a U.S. footprint hold more than $2.6 trillion in total assets, including foreign-based entities. Of that total, roughly $1.5 trillion represents direct private loans made to businesses within the United States, alongside equities and other corporate investments.
Data from the Fed reveals that U.S.-domiciled private credit vehicles owed commercial banks $349 billion by the end of 2025. Within this domestically domiciled segment, business development companies (BDCs) accounted for $181 billion of the bank debt. Private debt funds owed an additional $150 billion, while interval and tender-offer funds—which restrict share redemptions—owed $18 billion. The central bank had previously misclassified these bank loans under foreign financial entities, but correcting the asset classification has exposed a tight link between traditional banks and nonbank lenders.
Rising Payment-in-Kind Interest Signals Cash Flow Pressures
The structural exposure stems from a mismatch in cash settlement terms between fund investors, underlying borrowers, and financing banks. Private credit funds often utilize loan agreements that permit corporate borrowers to pay interest with additional debt rather than cash. While this mechanism gives struggling businesses more time to pay, funds must still service their own revolving credit lines from commercial banks using cash. Banks maintain strict protections such as senior distribution priority and physical collateral, allowing them to demand cash repayments from funds even when the underlying corporate borrowers fail to generate cash flow.
Research from the Boston Fed examining regulatory filings across 168 BDCs and nearly 890,000 corporate quarterly loan observations demonstrates a steady rise in non-cash settlements. By early 2026, approximately 10% of BDC loans actively utilized payment-in-kind (PIK) interest, up from roughly 6% in 2022. This metric specifically measures active PIK usage across nearly every major industry, excluding unexercised contractual options. As borrowers increasingly rely on added debt to satisfy interest, nonbank lenders are left paying higher borrowing costs to maintain capital capacity.
Concentrated Bank Financing and Rising Debt Costs
The reliance of nonbank lenders on traditional financial institutions is heavily concentrated among a small group of major lenders. Fed researchers analyzing BDC financing structures between 2012 and 2023 discovered that just five banks provided nearly two-thirds of all drawn bank lending to BDCs. Because BDCs rarely replace their existing banking partners, funds have limited leverage to negotiate when credit conditions tighten.
During periods of monetary tightening, commercial banks charged BDCs a pricing premium compared to similarly rated corporate borrowers at the same institutions, despite BDC credit facilities having collateral and senior legal status. These elevated financing costs are ultimately passed on to commercial borrowers in the form of higher interest rates on private loans. While long-term capital provided by institutional investors like insurance companies aligns well with extended private lending horizons, fund credit lines drawn from banks create immediate liquidity demands that non-cash borrower interest cannot easily cover.
About The Author
